Our goals are to highlight recent developments in clinically relevant PEEK research and to stimulate hypothesis-driven investigations related to medical grade polyaryletherketones.
Eight presentations and two panel discussions on the processing, pioneering implant applications, bioactive composites, biotribology, and future applications of PEEK are featured in a full-day conference at the 2010 Annual Medical Device and Manufacuring meeting in Mineapolis, MN (October 12, 2010). Please check out the PEEK Conferences section of the website for additional details on speakers and for links to the MD&D website.
Researchers from Japan have synthesized an antibiofouling and highly hydrophilic high-density nanometer-scaled layer on the surface of PEEK by photo-induced graft polymerization of 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC) without using any photo-initiators, i.e., "self-initiated surface graft polymerization." The results indicated that the diphenylketone moiety in the polymer backbone acted as a photo-initiator similar to benzophenone. This photo-induced polymerization process occurs only on the surface of the PEEK substrate; therefore, the desirable mechanical properties of PEEK would be maintained irrespective of the treatment used.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether material rod composition and its imaging characteristics can determine patient perceptions of pain, outcome, and need for revision surgery in the context of the failure of spinal instrumentation following lumbar arthrodesis. Back pain patients completed a questionnaire containing 3 alternative radiographic images of failed rod instrumentation following posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery. The images represented failed rods composed of either PEEK, PEEK with a longitudinal radio-opaque marker, or traditional titanium. The responses suggested a preference for the images representing PEEK instrumentation as being associated with superior clinical outcomes, the least pain, the most comfort, and the least likelihood of required revision surgery.
The objective of this project was to evaluate the biological response of two different kinds of carbon fiber-reinforced (CFR) PEEK compared with ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in vivo as a standard bearing material. Wear particles of the particulate biomaterials were injected into the left knee joint of female BALB/c mice. The results of this study suggest that wear debris of CFR-PEEK is comparable with UHMWPE in its biological activity.
The surface of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) was coated with a pure titanium (Ti) layer using an electron beam (e-beam) deposition method in order to enhance its biocompatibility and adhesion to bone tissue. The Ti coating layer strongly adhered to the PEEK substrate and remarkably enhanced its wettability. The Ti-coated samples were evaluated in terms of their in vitro cellular behaviors and in vivo osteointegration, and the results were compared to a pure PEEK substrate. In vivo animal tests showed that the Ti-coated PEEK implants had a much higher bone-in-contact (BIC) ratio than the pure PEEK implants.
The aim of this study was to compare, using the three-dimensional finite element method, the stress distribution in the peri-implant support bone of distinct models composed of PEEK components and implants reinforced with 30% carbon fiber (30% CFR-PEEK) or titanium. In simulations with a perfect bonding between the bone and the implant, the 30% CFR-PEEK presented higher stress concentration in the implant neck and the adjacent bone, due to the decreased stiffness and higher deformation in relation to the titanium. However, 30% CFR-PEEK implants and components did not exhibit any advantages in relation to the stress distribution compared to the titanium implants and components.
At the May 2010 ASTM Meeting in St. Louis, standard development activity continued for ASTM F2026, Standard Specification for Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Polymers for Surgical Implant Applications. The current working draft includes an update of the biocompatibility section. The revised standard will be ballotted in July/August 2010, and the results of this activity will be discussed at the November 2010 meeting of F04, between Tuesday November 16th 2010 - Friday November 19th 2010, at the Grand Hyatt San Antonio; San Antonio, TX US.
October 12, 2010, Minneapolis, MN
Chair: Steve Kurtz, Ph.D., Exponent
Part I: PEEK Appetizer
Overview of PEEK Biomaterials: Steve Kurtz
Making the Donuts: Grade Selection and Processing: Ken Kostecki, Technical Support Manager, Invibio
Part II: PEEK Design Pioneers
Origin of PEEK Brantigan Spinal Cages: Bill Christianson, Worldwide Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and External Relations, DePuy Spine
Design and Development of the Epoch Stem: Mike Hawkins, Ph.D., Vice President, Corporate Research, Zimmer, Inc.
Panel Discussion – What are the Regulatory Hurdles for PEEK Implantables?: SMK Moderator
Part III: Designing PEEK Implantables for New Applications
Design of PEEK Orthopedic Bearings: Mike Manley, Ph.D., Academic Director, Homer Stryker Center for Orthopaedic Education and Research
Design of Bioactive PEEK Composite Implants: Prof. Ryan Roeder, Notre Dame
Metal and HA Coating Technologies for PEEK Implants: invited speaker
Antimicrobial PEEK Solutions: Dave Jaekel, Drexel University
Panel Discussion – What is the future for PEEK Implantables?: SMK Moderator
For further details, please visit the MD&D website.